Explanation
Under Halsey Plan, in case, the worker completes the works in less than the standard time, then he/she will be paid according to the actual time, i.e, time-rate plus the bonus calculated at 50% of the saved time. Hence, option A is correct.
Garner Vs Murray: Loss by Insolvent Partner (Dissolution of Partnership Firm)!
If, at the time of dissolution, a partner owes a sum of money to the firm, he has to pay it to the firm. But if he is insolvent, he will not be able to do so, at least lot fully. The sum which is irrecoverable from an insolvent partner is, therefore, a loss. The question arises whether this loss is an ordinary loss to be shared by the solvent partners in the profit sharing ratio or whether it is an extraordinary loss. Before the decision in Garner vs. Murray was made, such a loss was treated as an ordinary loss.
The judgment in this case was that:
(a) First, the solvent partners should bring in cash equal to their respective shares of the loss on realisation; and
(b) Second, the loss due to the insolvency of a partner should be divided among the other partners in the ratio of capitals then standing (i.e., after partners have brought in cash equal to their shares of loss on realisation).
The practical effect of this is that the loss due to the insolvency of a partner has to be borne by the solvent partners in the ratio of their capitals standing just prior to dissolution.
When money is withdrawn at the middle of month:
When money is withdrawn in the middle of the month, the average period is calculated as under:
Average Period = Total of months/12
= 72 months/12
= 6 months
OR,Max. Period of Drawing + Min. Period of DrawingAverage Period = 2
= 11.5 + 0.5 = 12 = 6 months
X
2,40,000
12,000
Y
1,60,000
6,000
Z
1,00,000
3,000
Please disable the adBlock and continue. Thank you.
