CBSE Questions for Class 11 Commerce Legal Studies Judiciary - Constitutional Civil Criminal Courts And Processes Quiz 14 - MCQExams.com

Nisha has committed:
  • A Type 1 Offence
  • A Type 2 Offence
  • A Type 3 Offence
  • All of the above
 Is the passer-by guilty of committing a Type 4 Offence?
  • No, the passer-by did not exhort the pup to fight for the sake of entertainment.
  • No, entertaining children does not fetch money.
  • No, inciting an animal to fight for ones personal entertainment cannot be considered an offence.
  • None of the above.
Has Mehek violated the law? Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.
  • Yes, she shifted the venue of her birthday party to an area that is close to the airport.
  • No, she was not aware of the laws against flying of drones near the airport.
  • Yes, she is liable for the acts of her employees.
  • No, she did not require that the photography of her event be done using drones.
Did Seema violate the Mahabali Akhadas Anti-Doping Code on Possession of Prohibited Substances? Choose the option with the correct answer as well as the most appropriate explanation for it.
  • No; prior to being notified of an anti-doping rule violation, Seema took action to demonstrate that she never intended to have possession of the Prohibited Substance and renounced its possession.
  • Yes; Seemas samples tested positive for the Prohibited Substance.
  • No; because the Code states that purchase of a Prohibited Substance constitutes possession by the person and Seema did not make the purchase herself.
  • Yes; she gained constructive possession of Dexamethasone and consumed it.
Komalika is in the same batch as Madhav, Sarala, and Hamsa at the NLU. Since she has a wide variety of interests in addition to her law studies, she decides to study Physics along with her law programme. She, therefore, enrols in an online Bachelors in Physics programme provided by a famous overseas university. When Sarala hears about this, she brings it to the attention of the Registrar of the NLU and argues thatKomalika should not be allowed to enrol in the Physics programme since it has no relation to her law studies, and Komalikas enrolment in the Physics programme violates UGC rules. Is Sarala correct?
  • No, since Komalika alone can decide where her interests lie and what she wishes to study
  • No, since the UGC rules do not place any restrictions on what stream the second-degree programme a student wishes to enrol for, relates to.
  • Yes, since studying for the Physics program would only distract Komalika from her law studies
  • Yes, since Physics and Law are completely unrelated subjects.
Assuming that Drone Boyz Co is charged with violating Regulations on operation of drones, which of the following is good defence for Drone Boyz Co to take?
  • That Rajat breached the Regulations in his individual capacity.
  • That Mehek shifted the venue of her birthday party at the last minute.
  • That the makers of the app to control the Drone are liable.
  • None of the above.
Drone Boyz Co intends to acquire a drone weighing 250 gm to photograph a football match. It intends to fly the drone to the roof of a pavilion at the football stadium that is at a height of 200 feet from the ground. Will it require a permit to do so under the policy?
  • Yes, the new drone cannot be flown at that height without a permit.
  • No, the new drone is proposed to be flown at a height allowed under the exception.
  • No, the new drone is within the weight category for Micro drones which are exempt from the requirement of a permit.
  • There is insufficient information to answer this question.
Did Robin breach the requirement of a permit?
  • No, he did not operate a drone for commercial purposes.
  • Yes, the drone he threw was being used for commercial purposes.
  • Yes, his house is near the airport.
  • No, the drone weighed only 179 grams.
Which type of jurisdiction is enjoyed by the Supreme Court but not the High Court ?
  • Original
  • Appellate
  • Revisory
  • Advisory
Which of the following High Courts has jurisdiction over a Union Territory?
  • Calcutta
  • Patna
  • Bangalore
  • Allahabad
Where is the High Court of Uttranchal situated?
  • Dehradun
  • Haridwar
  • Haldwani
  • Nainital
In a criminal case, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court if the High Court 
I. has convicted the accused and awarded him death sentence.
II. has on appeal reversed an order for acquittal of an accused and sentenced him to an imprisonment of ten years or more.
III. has withdrawn for trial before itself any case from a subordinate court and has in such trial convicted the accused and sentenced him to death.
  • I and III
  • II and III
  • III only
  • I ,II, III
Which state does not have its High Court at the Capital?
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Kerala
  • Bihar
  • Jammu & Kashmir
If offices of both the President and the Vice President become vacant at any time, who will discharge the functions of the President?
  • The Chief Justice of India
  • The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
  • The Chief Election Commissioner
  • The Prime Minister
In which year was the High Court first established?
  • 1861
  • 1860
  • 1972
  • 1980
Which of the following, regarding the advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court are correct?
It is binding on the Supreme Court to give its opinion on any matter referred to it by the President.
The full bench of the Supreme Court hears any reference made to it under its power of advisory jurisdiction.
The opinion given by the Supreme Court on a reference under advisory jurisdiction is not binding on the government.
Not more than one reference at a time can be made to the Supreme Court under its power of advisory jurisdiction. 
  • I and II
  • I and III
  • II and III
  • II and IV
In which of the following cases appeals cannot be lodged with the Supreme Court?
  • Constitutional matters involving a substantial point of law.
  • A sentence in a criminal case given by the lower court and confirmed by the High Court.
  • Criminal case in which High Court has given a death sentence to a criminal found non-guilty by a lower court
  • Criminal case in which High Court after withdrawing a case from the lower court has given a death sentence.

An AD INTERIM stay means _________.
  • an unusual stay
  • a usual stay
  • in the meantime
  • none of these
How many High Courts in India have jurisdiction over more than one State (Union Territories not included)?
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Consider the following:
1. Supreme Court's power to issue writs is narrower than that of High Courts.
A citizen is free to approach High Court or Supreme Court as he chooses, whenever his Fundamental Rights are violated.
The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts throughout India. 
Which of the above statement(s) is are correct?
  • 1 alone
  • 1 and 2
  • 1, 2 and 3
  • 2 and 3
Which of the following statements regarding Judiciary in India are correct?
I. Supreme Court of India is free from the control and influence of Legislature and Executive.
II. Subordinate courts are at the head of the judicial hierarchy of the State.
III. The Chief Justice and other Judges of the High Court are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.
IV. A High Court can withdraw a case from a subordinate court and can deal with the case itself if it is satisfied that the case involves a substantial point of constitutional law.
  • I and II
  • I and III
  • I and IV
  • II, III and IV
All the courts in India except ___________ and _____________ are subordinate courts.
  • The Supreme Court
  • The High Courts
  • The Labour Courts
  • Both A and B
The Constitution gives the powers of superintendence over all subordinate courts to the High Courts under Article _____________.
  • 226
  • 227
  • 228
  • 229
Pre-constitution __________ decisions are binding on the __________ unless overruled by the _________.
  • Supreme Court; Privy Council; High Court
  • High Court; Privy Council; Supreme Court
  • Privy Council; High Court; Supreme Court
  • High Court; Supreme Court; Privy Council
A precedent is either binding on or persuasive when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. Which of the following would not be a valid precedent for deciding on Nainas complaint against Seema?
  • A case involving an athlete in whose car, a protein supplement containing a banned steroid was found.
  • A case involving an athlete who added a sauce containing a banned growth hormone to a bowl of pasta to be consumed by a rival athlete.
  • A case involving a weightlifter whose spouse operated a pharmacy that stocked medicines with prohibited substances and traces of which were found in the weightlifters samples.
  • A case involving a badminton player who was caught with energy bars that contained a prohibited performance-enhancing drug.
The Mahabali Akhadas Anti-Doping Code on Presence of Prohibited Substances in an Athletes Sample contains a rule that states the following: It is the Athletes personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters their bodies. Athletes are responsible for any Prohibited Substance or its metabolites found to be present in their Samples. Has Seema violated this rule? Choose the option with the correct answer as well as the most appropriate explanation for it.
  • No; Seema was only following her doctors advice.
  • No; Seema followed her personal duty to ensure that the Prohibited Substance does not enter her body by renouncing its possession as soon as she learnt that the Cofdex contains a Prohibited Substance.
  • Yes; Seema violated the rule by providing her samples before the Prohibited Substance had left her system.
  • Yes; Seema failed to prevent the banned substance from entering her body.
Aaron is charged with a Type 3 Offence and he defends the charge by saying that his actions are saved by the Experiments Exception under law. Which of the following statements is true in relation to Aarons actions?
  • Aaron is not guilty since he performed an experiment to save himself (a human being) from suffering.
  • Aaron is not guilty since he performed an experiment with the intention of prolonging the life of the pup.
  • Aaron is guilty since his actions do not constitute an experiment done with the purpose of advancement by new discovery of knowledge for saving or for prolonging life or alleviating suffering or for combating any disease.
  • Aaron is guilty since offences cannot be performed in the course of experiments for advancement by discovery of new knowledge.
Which of the following, if true, is a good defence from Nishas perspective?
  • It had become dark and the stray dogs at the beach were about to attack Nisha.
  • Ameena did not tell her that the pup could not be given ice-cream.
  • The best way to discipline pups is by dealing with them harshly when they misbehave.
  • Nisha left the pup because she had messaged Ameena asking why the pup was growling and had not received a response for over 5 minutes.
At the time of making her complaint, did Naina have sufficient basis to say that Seema had constructive possession of a Prohibited Substance? Choose the option with the correct answer as well as the most appropriate explanation for it.
  • Yes; Seemas samples tested positive for Dexamethasone.
  • No; Seema did not know that Cofdex contained the Prohibited Substance at the time of Nainas complaint.
  • Yes; Seemas driver was procuring it for Seema.
  • Yes; Seema exercised control over her driver and thereby acquired constructive possession.
Ameena has committed:
  • A Type 1 Offence
  • A Type 2 Offence
  • A Type 3 Offence
  • No offence
0:0:1


Answered Not Answered Not Visited Correct : 0 Incorrect : 0

Practice Class 11 Commerce Legal Studies Quiz Questions and Answers