Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
MCQExams
0:0:1
CBSE
JEE
NTSE
NEET
Practice
Homework
×
CBSE Questions for Class 10 Maths Real Numbers Quiz 3 - MCQExams.com
CBSE
Class 10 Maths
Real Numbers
Quiz 3
State whether true or false:
3
+
√
6
is an irrational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
AS we know 3 is a rational number and
√
6
is also an irrational number
The addition of rational and irrational numbers is always an irrational number
So, 3 +
√
6
is also a irrational number
Which of the following is an irrational number?
Report Question
0%
0.14
0%
0.14
¯
16
0%
1.1
416
0%
0.4014001400014....
Explanation
The decimal expansion of a rational number is either terminating or non-terminating repeating.
(A)
0.14
is terminating, so it is a rational number
(B)
0.14
¯
16
=
0.141616....
is also rational ( non-terminating repeating ), where digits
16
are repeating.
(C)
0.1416
is terminating, so it is a rational number
(D)
0.4014001400014.....
is an irrational number because it is neither terminating nor repeating.
2
−
√
3
is an irrational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
√
3
is an irrational number.
Since, the difference of a rational and irrational number is irrational, hence,
2
−
√
3
is an irrational number.
Which of the following is always true
Report Question
0%
i
r
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
+
i
r
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
=
i
r
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
0%
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
=
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
0%
i
n
t
e
g
e
r
i
n
t
e
g
e
r
=
i
n
t
e
g
e
r
0%
None of these
Explanation
Counter-example for A:
(
√
2
)
+
(
4
−
√
2
)
=
4
Counter-example for C:
1
2
=
0.5
Proof for B:
Le
t
q
1
,
q
2
be two rational numbers such that
q
2
≠
0
.
As they are rational, they can be written as
a
/
b
,
c
/
d
respectively for some integers
a
,
b
,
c
,
d
.
(
b
,
c
,
d
≠
0
)
q
1
q
2
=
a
/
b
c
/
d
=
a
d
b
c
Since,
a
,
b
,
c
,
d
were integers, even
a
d
and
b
c
(
≠
0
)
are integers and therefore, the above expression is rational.
2
2
+
√
3
is an irrational number
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let if possible
(
2
+
√
3
)
is rational
then
2
+
√
3
=
a
b
,
b
≠=
0
⇒
√
3
=
a
b
−
2
⇒
√
3
=
a
−
2
b
b
. . . .eq.1
∵
a
&
b
are integer.
∵
a
−
2
b
is also an integer.
⇒
a
−
2
b
b
is rational.
LHS of the equation is the square root of a prime number.
So it is irrational and R.H.S. is rational.
Which is a contradiction. Because a rational number and an irrational number can be never equal.
So, our assumption i.e.
2
+
√
3
is rational wrong.
Hence
(
2
+
√
3
)
is an irrational number.
∴
This is true.
∴
option A is correct.
State whether the following statement is true or not:
(
3
+
√
5
)
is an irrational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let us suppose
3
+
√
5
is rational.
Thus
3
+
√
5
is in the form of
p
q
where
p
and
q
are integers and
q
≠
0
⇒
√
5
=
p
q
−
3
⇒
√
5
=
p
−
3
q
q
as
p
,
q
and
3
are integers
p
−
3
q
q
is a rational number.
⇒
√
5
is a rational number.
But we know that
√
5
is an irrational number.
So this is a contradiction.
This contradiction has arisen because of our wrong assumption that
3
+
√
5
is a rational number.
Hence
3
+
√
5
is an irrational number.
State the following statement is True or False
987
10500
will have terminating decimal expansion.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Terminating decimal expansion, because
987
10500
=
329
3500
=
329
2
2
.5
3
.7
=
47
2
2
.5
3
H.C.F. of
26
and
91
is:
Report Question
0%
13
0%
2366
0%
91
0%
182
Explanation
Prime factors of
26
=
2
×
13
Prime factors of
91
=
7
×
13
As
13
is the only common factor.
Therefore,
H
C
F
(
26
,
91
)
=
13
The product of a non-zero rational and an irrational number is
Report Question
0%
always irrational
0%
always rational
0%
rational or irrational
0%
one
Explanation
Let
x
be a rational number and
y
be an irrational number.
Let
x
y
=
a
.
Let us assume that
a
is rational.
Since,
a
is rational it can be expressed as
p
q
, where
p
and
q
are integers.
Let
x
=
m
n
, where
m
and
n
are integers.
Now,
x
y
=
a
m
y
n
=
p
q
.
On cross multipliying we get,
⇒
y
=
p
n
q
m
.
Now,
p
n
and
q
m
are integers.
Hence,
p
n
q
m
is a rational number.
However,
y
is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is incorrect.
Hence, the product of a non-zero rational and an irrational number is always an Irrational number.
So, option
A
.
According to Euclid's division algorithm, using Euclid's division lemma for any two positive integers
a
and
b
with
a
>
b
enables us to find the
Report Question
0%
HCF
0%
LCM
0%
Decimal expansion
0%
Quotient
Explanation
According to Euclid's division lemma,
For each pair of positive integers
a
and
b
, we can find unique integers
q
and
r
satisfying the relation
a
=
b
q
+
r
,
0
≤
r
<
b
If
r
=
0
then q will be HCF of
a
and
b
The basis of the Euclidean division algorithm is Euclid’s division lemma.
To calculate the Highest Common Factor (HCF) of two positive integers
a
and
b
we use Euclid’s division algorithm.
HCF is the largest number which exactly divides two or more positive integers.
By exactly we mean that on dividing both the integers
a
and
b
by HCF, the remainder is zero.
So correct answer is option A
State True or False:
6
+
√
2
is a rational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let's assume that
6
+
√
2
is rational.....
then
6
+
√
2
=
p
/
q
√
2
=
(
p
−
6
q
)
/
(
q
)
now take
p
−
6
q
to be P and
q
to be Q........where P and Q are integers
which means,
√
2
=
P
/
Q
......
But this contradicts the fact that
√
2
is rational
So our assumption is wrong and
6
+
√
2
is irrational.
Euclids division lemma states that if a and b are any two
+
ve integers, then there exists unique integers q and r such that :
Report Question
0%
a
=
b
q
+
r
,
0
<
r
<
b
0%
a
=
b
q
+
r
,
0
≤
r
≤
b
0%
a
=
b
q
+
r
,
0
≤
r
<
b
0%
a
=
b
q
+
r
,
0
<
b
<
r
Explanation
Division Algorithm: Euclids division lemme states that if a and b are any two positive integers then there exist unique integers q and r such that,
a
=
q
b
+
r
0
≤
r
<
b
∴
option C is correct.
Proof: We begin by proving that the set s = {a - xb | x is an integer: a-xb
≥
0 }
is non-empty. To do this, if suffices to exhibit a value of x making a-xb nonnegative a value of x making a-xb nonnegative. Because the integer b
≥
1 , we have |a| b
≥
|a| and so -
a
−
(
−
|
a
|
)
b
=
a
+
|
a
|
b
≥
a
+
|
a
|
≥
0
For the choice x = -|a|, then a - xb lies in s. This paves the way for an application of well ordering principle, from which we infer that the set S contains a smallest integer : call it r. By the definition S,
∃
an integer q satisfying , r = a - qb ,
0
≤
r
we argue that r < b. If this were not this case, then r
≥
0 and a - ( q + 1 ) b = ( a - q b ) - b = r - b
≥
0
This implication is that the integer a - ( q + 1 ) b has the proper form to belong to the set S. But a - ( q + 1 ) b = r - b < r , leading to a contradiction of the choice of r as the smallest member of S. Hence r < b .
Next we turn to the task of showing the uniqueness of q and r. Suppose that a has two representation of the desired form say,
a
=
q
b
+
r
=
q
′
b
+
r
′
Where
0
≤
r
<
b
,
0
≤
r
′
<
b
.
Then
r
′
−
r
=
b
(
q
−
q
′
)
and, owing to the fact that
|
r
′
−
r
|
=
b
|
q
−
q
′
|
upon adding two inequalities
−
b
<
−
r
≤
0
and
0
≤
r
′
<
b
we obtain
−
b
<
r
′
−
r
<
b
⇒
|
r
′
−
r
|
<
b
Thus,
b
|
q
−
q
′
|
<
b
which yields
0
≤
|
q
−
q
′
|
<
1
As,
|
q
−
q
′
|
is positive, the only possibility is that
|
q
−
q
′
|
=
0
where
q
=
q
′
:
this is turns give
r
=
r
′
and ends the proof.
Write whether every positive integer can be of the form
4
q
+
2
, where
q
is an integer.
Report Question
0%
Yes
0%
No
0%
Ambiguous
0%
Data Insufficient
Explanation
No, all positive integers cannot be written in the form of
4
q
+
2
Because,
4
q
+
2
=
2
(
2
q
+
1
)
Therefore,
4
q
+
2
is an even number.
So, we can't write odd numbers in the form
4
q
+
2
(where
q
is an integer)
Also
2
q
+
1
is an odd number, hence the maximum power of
2
that divides
4
q
+
1
is
1
. Therefore, we can't represent the numbers divisible by
4
this form.
If
d
is the
H
C
F
of 45 and 27, then
x
,
y
satisfying
d
=
27
x
+
45
y
are :
Report Question
0%
x
=
2
,
y
=
1
0%
x
=
2
,
y
=
−
1
0%
x
=
−
1
,
y
=
2
0%
x
=
−
1
,
y
=
−
2
Explanation
Applying Euclid's division lemma to
27
and
45
, we get
45
=
27
×
1
+
18
...(1)
27
=
18
×
1
+
9
...(2)
18
=
9
×
2
+
0
...(3)
Since the remainder is zero, therefore, last divisor
9
is the
H
C
F
of
27
and
45
.
From (2), we get
9
=
27
−
18
×
1
=
27
−
(
45
−
27
×
1
)
×
1
[
u
s
i
n
g
(
1
)
]
=
27
−
45
×
1
+
27
×
1
×
1
=
27
−
45
+
27
=
54
−
45
⇒
9
=
27
×
2
−
45
×
1
...(4)
Comparing (4) with
d
=
27
x
+
45
y
, we get
d
=
9
,
x
=
2
a
n
d
y
=
−
1
Say true or false:
A positive integer is of the form 3q + 1, q being a natural number, then you write its square in any form other than 3m + 1, i.e.,3m or 3m + 2 for some integer m.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let the positive integer
n
is of the form
3
q
,
3
q
+
1
,
and
3
q
+
2
If
n
=
3
q
Squaring both sides, we get,
=>
n
2
=
9
q
2
=>
n
2
=
3
(
3
q
2
)
=>
n
2
=
3
m
, where
m
=
3
q
2
Now, if
n
=
3
q
+
1
=>
n
2
=
(
3
q
+
1
)
2
=>
n
2
=
9
q
2
+
6
q
+
1
=>
n
2
=
3
q
(
3
q
+
2
)
+
1
=>
n
2
=
3
m
+
1
,
where
m
=
q
(
3
q
+
2
)
Now, if
n
=
3
q
+
2
=>
n
2
=
(
3
q
+
2
)
2
=>
n
2
=
9
q
2
+
12
q
+
4
=>
n
2
=
3
q
(
3
q
+
4
)
+
4
=>
n
2
=
3
q
(
3
q
+
4
)
+
3
+
1
=>
n
2
=
3
m
+
1
where
m
=
(
3
q
2
+
4
q
+
1
)
Hence,
n
2
integer is of the form
3
m
and
3
m
+
1
not
3
m
+
2
H.C.F. of
6
,
72
and
120
is:
Report Question
0%
6
0%
2
0%
3
0%
1
Explanation
Factors of 6 are
1
,
2
,
3
,
6
Factors of 72 are
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
6
,
8
,
9
,
12
,
18
,
24
,
36
,
72
Factors of 120 are
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
8
,
10
,
12
,
15
,
20
,
24
,
30
,
40
,
60
,
120
The highest factor in all the three is
6
.
State true or false:
√
2
is not a rational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let us assume that
√
2
is a rational number
⇒
√
2
=
p
q
[
p
q
i
s
i
n
s
i
m
p
l
e
s
t
f
o
r
m
]
⇒
2
q
2
=
p
2
p
2
is even
⇒
p
is even
⇒
p
=
2
k
2
q
2
=
4
k
2
⇒
q
2
=
2
k
2
⇒
q
2
is even
⇒
q
is even.
⇒
p
,
q
have 2 as a common factor which is contradiction to assumption.
∴
√
2
=
p
q
is a false
⇒
√
2
is not a rational.
Use Euclid's division lemma to find the HCF of the following
16 and 176
Report Question
0%
16
0%
14
0%
10
0%
12
Explanation
by using Euclid's division lemma,
a
=
b
q
+
r
;
r
greater than or equal to 0, and
r
less than
b
176
=
(
16
)
(
11
)
+
0
,
H
.
C
.
F
=
16
Euclid's division lemma states that for two positive integers a and b, there exist unique integers q and r such that
a
=
b
q
+
r
, where r must satisfy
Report Question
0%
1 < r < b
0%
0
<
r
≤
b
0%
0
≤
r
<
b
0%
0 < r < b
Explanation
If
r
must satisfy
0
≤
r
<
b
Proof,
.
.
,
a
−
3
b
,
a
−
2
b
,
a
−
b
,
a
,
a
+
b
,
a
+
2
b
,
a
+
3
b
,
.
.
clearly it is an arithmetic progression with common difference
b
and it extends infinitely in both directions.
Let
r
be the smallest non-negative term of this arithmetic progression.Then,there exists a non-negative integer
q
such that,
a
−
b
q
=
r
=>
a
=
b
q
+
r
As,
r
is the smallest non-negative integer satisfying the result.Therefore,
0
≤
r
≤
b
Thus, we have
a
=
b
q
1
+
r
1
,
0
≤
r
1
≤
b
If HCF of
210
and
55
is of the form
(
210
)
(
5
)
+
55
y
, then the value of
y
is :
Report Question
0%
−
19
0%
−
18
0%
5
0%
55
Explanation
HCF of 210 and 55 is 5
Given HCF =
(
210
)
(
5
)
+
55
y
5
=
(
210
)
(
5
)
+
55
y
55
y
=
−
1045
On solving this equation we get
y
=
−
19
So, correct answer will be option A
Use Euclid's division lemma to find the HCF of
40
and
248
.
Report Question
0%
4
0%
10
0%
6
0%
8
Explanation
Here,
a
=
248
and
b
=
40
by using Euclid's division lemma,
a
=
b
q
+
r
;
0
≤
r
<
b
248
=
40
×
6
+
8
40
=
8
×
5
+
0
∴
H
.
C
.
F
(
40
,
248
)
=
8
hence option
D
is correct.
The decimal expansion of the rational number
23
2
3
5
2
, will terminate after how many places of decimal?
Report Question
0%
1
0%
3
0%
4
0%
5
Explanation
23
2
3
5
2
=
23
2
(
2
)
2
(
5
)
2
=
23
2
(
2
×
5
)
2
=
23
2
(
10
)
2
=
11.5
100
=
0.115
Therefore, the decimal expansion of the rational number
23
2
3
5
2
will terminate after three places of decimal.
Use Euclid's division lemma to find the HCF of the following
27727 and 53124
Report Question
0%
233
0%
200
0%
154
0%
212
Explanation
Here,
a
=
53124
and
b
=
27727
by using Euclid's division lemma,
a
=
b
q
+
r
;
0
<
r
<
b
53124
=
(
27727
)
(
1
)
+
25397
27727
=
(
25397
)
(
1
)
+
2330
25397
=
(
2330
)
(
10
)
+
2097
2330
=
(
2097
)
(
1
)
+
233
2097
=
(
233
)
(
9
)
+
0
H.C.F is
233
Use Euclid's division lemma to find the HCF :
65 and 495.
Report Question
0%
5
0%
10
0%
15
0%
0
Explanation
According to Euclid’s Division Lemma if we have two positive integers
a
and
b
, then there exists unique integers
q
and
r
which satisfies the condition
a
=
b
q
+
r
where
0
≤
r
<
b
.
H
C
F
is the largest number which exactly divides two or more positive integers.
By Euclid's division lemma, we mean that on dividing both the integers
a
and
b
, the remainder is zero.
The given integers are
a
=
65
and
b
=
495
.
Clearly
495
>
65
.
So, we will apply Euclid’s division lemma to
65
and
495
, we get,
495
=
(
65
×
7
)
+
40
Since the remainder
40
≠
0
. So we again apply the division lemma to the divisor
65
and remainder
40
. We get,
65
=
(
40
×
1
)
+
25
Again
the remainder
25
≠
0
, so
applying the division lemma to the new divisor
40
and remainder
25
. We get,
40
=
(
25
×
1
)
+
15
Now, again
the remainder
15
≠
0
, so
applying the division lemma to the new divisor
25
and remainder
15
. We get,
25
=
(
15
×
1
)
+
10
Again
the remainder
10
≠
0
, so
applying the division lemma to the new divisor
15
and remainder
10
. We get,
15
=
(
10
×
1
)
+
5
Again
the remainder
5
≠
0
, so
applying the division lemma to the new divisor
10
and remainder
5
. We get,
10
=
(
5
×
1
)
+
0
Finally we get the remainder
0
and the divisor is
5
.
Hence, the
H
C
F
of
65
and
495
is
5
.
Use Euclid's division lemma to find the
H
C
F
of the following numbers:
8068
and
12464
Report Question
0%
4
0%
2
0%
0
0%
1
Explanation
Here,
a
=
12464
and
b
=
8068
So, by using Euclid's division lemma,
a
=
b
q
+
r
;
0
<
r
<
b
12464
=
(
8068
)
(
1
)
+
4396
8068
=
(
4396
)
(
1
)
+
3672
4396
=
(
3672
)
(
1
)
+
724
3672
=
(
724
)
(
5
)
+
52
724
=
(
52
)
(
13
)
+
48
52
=
(
48
)
(
1
)
+
4
48
=
(
4
)
(
12
)
+
0
Hence,
H
C
F
of
8068
and
12464
is equal to
4.
Without doing any actual division, find which of the following rational numbers have terminating decimal representation :
(i)
7
16
(ii)
23
125
(iii)
9
14
(iv)
32
45
(v)
43
50
(vi)
17
40
(vii)
61
75
(viii)
123
250
Report Question
0%
(i), (iii), (v), (vi) and (vii)
0%
(i), (ii), (v), (vi) and (viii)
0%
(i), (iii), (v), (vi) and (viii)
0%
(i), (ii), (v), (vi) and (vii)
Explanation
The rational not having denominator as multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
will be non terminating.
(1)
7
16
=
7
2
×
2
×
2
×
2
−
denominator is multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence terminating
.
(2)
23
125
=
23
5
×
5
×
5
-- denominator is multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence terminating.
(3)
9
14
=
9
7
×
2
-- denominator is not multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence non-terminating
(4)
32
45
=
32
3
×
3
×
5
-- denominator is not multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence non-terminating.
(5)
43
50
=
43
5
×
5
×
2
-- denominator is multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence terminating.
(6)
17
40
=
17
2
×
2
×
2
×
5
-- denominator is multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence terminating.
(7)
61
75
-- denominator is not multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence non-terminating
.
(8)
123
250
=
123
5
×
5
×
5
×
2
-- denominator is multiple of
2
m
×
5
n
hence terminating.
(i), (ii), (v), (vi) and (viii) will have terminating decimal.
The given pair of numbers
231
,
396
are __________ .
Report Question
0%
multiple of each other
0%
factors of each other
0%
co-prime to each other
0%
having a difference of
120
among each other
Explanation
Euclid's division lemma,
a
=
b
q
+
r
;
0
≤
r
<
b
Applying Euclid's Algorithim to
231
,
395
395
=
231
×
1
+
164
231
=
164
×
1
+
67
164
=
67
×
2
+
30
67
=
30
×
2
+
7
30
=
7
×
4
+
2
7
=
2
×
3
+
1
2
=
1
×
2
+
0
The given numbers have only
1
as common factor.
Hence, the given numbers are co-prime.
State: True or False
3
+
2
√
5
is an irrational number.
Report Question
0%
True
0%
False
Explanation
Let us assume, to the contrary, that
3
+
2
√
5
is rational.
That is, we can find coprime integers
a
and
b
(b does not equal to 0) such that
3
+
2
√
5
=
a
b
.
Therefore,
a
b
−
3
=
2
√
5
a
−
3
b
b
=
2
√
5
a
−
3
b
2
b
=
√
5
a
2
b
−
3
2
=
√
5
Since
a
and
b
are integers and rational, we get
a
2
b
−
3
2
is rational, and so
a
−
3
b
2
b
=
√
5
is rational.
But this contradicts the fact that
√
5
is irrational.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that
3
+
2
√
5
is rational.
So, we conclude that
3
+
2
√
5
is irrational.
Without actually performing the long division, state whether the following rational numbers will have a terminating decimal expansion or a non-terminating repeating decimal expansion.
29
343
Report Question
0%
Terminating
0%
Non-terminating
0%
Ambiguous
0%
Data insufficient
Explanation
Given,
29
343
=
29
7
3
As it is not in the form of
2
m
×
5
n
.
So, the rational number
29
343
has a non terminating decimal expansion
If these numbers form
positive odd integer
6q+1, or 6q+3 or 6q+5 for some q then q belongs to:
Report Question
0%
integers
0%
irrational
0%
real
0%
none of these
Explanation
We know that product and sum of integers will give integer.
Given
6
q
+
1
,
6
q
+
3
,
6
q
+
5
are integers so
6
q
will be integer and then q will be integer.
So correct answer will be option A.
0:0:1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
Answered
1
Not Answered
29
Not Visited
Correct : 0
Incorrect : 0
Report Question
×
What's an issue?
Question is wrong
Answer is wrong
Other Reason
Want to elaborate a bit more? (optional)
Practice Class 10 Maths Quiz Questions and Answers
<
>
Support mcqexams.com by disabling your adblocker.
×
Please disable the adBlock and continue.
Thank you.
Reload page